Mercer Mettl Alternative and Mettl Alternatives for Skills Testing
The closest Mercer Mettl alternatives are iMocha, TestGorilla and Testlify for skills libraries, and Assessing AI when you want your own job test, scored on submit, without a sales call. Mettl publishes no prices. The only public figure is a Capterra listing from $25,000 a year for coding assessments. Assessing AI Starter is $49 a month with no contract, for up to 500 responses a month.
Type a job title into the generator and read the draft. If you need proctored exams for thousands of candidates, Mettl is built for that and this page says so. If you need to screen a few hundred applicants for ordinary roles, read on.
Draft a skills test for your role
No account needed to build your first test. The sample has 5 questions and appears instantly in your dashboard. Before you subscribe, your account can build 3 trial assessments with up to 10 questions and 25 responses each.
Sort by score, then read the answers that matter
Mettl is a proctoring and enterprise assessment suite. For ordinary roles the first question is simpler: who can do the basics. On Assessing AI one link opens a short job test. Choice answers are scored on submit, so you rank applicants by score and review recorded answers only from people who cleared your bar.
- Audio or video recorded answers from Starter
- Transcript of any recording on request
- Applicants answer in the browser without an account
Why employers look for a Mercer Mettl alternative
Mercer Mettl is a serious platform with proctoring, a large question library and enterprise security. People shop around for reasons that have little to do with its quality.
No price until a sales call
The Mettl pricing page offers a custom plan and a quote. You cannot compare it to anything before booking a demo, which is a long way to go for a 100-person hiring round.
Enterprise scale for a small round
Mettl is priced around usage and contracts. Third-party estimates run from a few thousand dollars for 10 users to $25,000 a year on a Capterra listing, none of them confirmed by the vendor.
Per-attempt costs are unclear
Some buyers report pay-per-attempt rates on top of a subscription. With no public rate card you only learn the real cost per candidate after volume is quoted.
You want your own questions
A library test measures generic skills. A test written from your job post checks the tasks your team does, such as reading a schedule or handling a refund.
Contract length
Annual contracts suit big programs. Employers who hire in bursts want to pay for the months they hire.
Setup time
Proctoring suites need onboarding. A link-based test can be live the same afternoon.
How to replace a Mettl screen with a job test
List what the first round checks
Write down the three or four things a strong hire gets right in the first week.
Turn them into questions
Paste the job post. On Plus the AI drafts the questions; on Starter you write them. Keep eight to twelve and set a pass score.
Add a recorded answer if voice matters
For support, sales and client roles, add one audio or video question with a time limit.
Send one link and rank by score
Applicants answer in the browser without an account. Sort by score and review the top group.
Mercer Mettl alternatives compared on price and fit
Figures come from vendor pricing pages and public listings checked in October 2026. Mettl does not publish prices, so its entry shows listing data only.
| Tool | Starting price | Billing | What you get | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercer Mettl | Quote only (Capterra lists $25,000 a year for coding assessments) | Custom contract | Proctoring, large library, coding, enterprise security | Large programs and certification exams |
| iMocha | Quote only (Capterra lists Basic around $400 a month billed annually) | Annual | Skills library, coding, proctoring options | Technical hiring at scale |
| TestGorilla Core | From $215 a month, billed annually | Annual | Test library, 2 seats, 5 custom questions | Teams that want ready-made tests |
| Testlify Standard | $1,668 a year, 100 credits | Annual, credits expire | Library, white label, ATS as add-ons | Teams with steady volume |
| Assessing AI Starter | $49 a month, or $288 a year | Monthly, no contract | Your own job test, scored choice questions, audio or video answers, 500 responses a month, 3 seats | Small employers screening for ordinary roles |
| Assessing AI Plus | $149 a month, or $888 a year | Monthly, no contract | AI drafts the test from the job post, 2,000 responses, 10 collaborators | Recruiters screening several roles a month |
Who should switch, and who should stay on Mercer Mettl
Switch if the job has a checkable skill
Bookkeeping, dispatch, support, data entry, scheduling. If a wrong answer is clearly wrong, test it.
Switch if a posting brings 100+ applicants
A scored first step sorts the pile before anyone books a call.
Switch if you hire a few months a year
Monthly billing means you pay for the months you screen.
Stay if you need live proctoring
Assessing AI takes webcam still photos with consent. It has no live or video proctoring, which Mettl does.
Stay if you test coding in an editor
Assessing AI has no code execution. Mettl and iMocha run code.
Stay if you need ID verification
Assessing AI does not verify identity documents.
What Mercer Mettl costs next to a flat test plan
Mercer Mettl does not show prices. Its pricing page lists a custom plan and a quote request, and the only public number is a Capterra listing from $25,000 a year for coding assessments. Other trackers estimate $3,000 to $15,000 for a first year with 10 users, but those are unsourced. For a 300-candidate round, a quote at those levels works out to $10 to $80 per candidate. Assessing AI Starter at $49 a month covers 500 responses, about 10 cents each, if you use the month fully. See the full breakdown in Mercer Mettl pricing.
What Assessing AI does and does not do
Assessing AI builds a short job test from a role description. On Plus the AI drafts multiple choice, written and recorded questions; on Starter you write them. Choice answers are scored the moment the applicant submits. Written and recorded answers wait in one results view for your team to score. Starter adds time limits, copy and paste blocking, personal invite links, webcam still photos with consent and pass certificates. The honest limits: no live proctoring, no ID verification, no code execution, no ATS, no AI scoring of open answers and no validated norm library.
Mercer Mettl alternative questions buyers ask
What is the best alternative to Mercer Mettl?
It depends on the use. For a skills library, iMocha, TestGorilla or Testlify. For ordinary roles where you want your own scored job test and recorded answers, Assessing AI Starter at $49 a month. For live proctored exams at scale, Mettl itself remains the stronger fit.
How much does Mercer Mettl cost?
Mercer Mettl does not publish prices. A Capterra listing shows coding assessments from $25,000 a year, and other trackers estimate $3,000 to $15,000 for 10 users in year one. None are confirmed by the vendor, so get a written quote.
Does Mercer Mettl have a free trial?
Mettl advertises a free trial on its site. Assessing AI has no free trial, but the generator on this page drafts a sample test first, and the most you commit is one month at $49 with no contract.
Is there a cheaper alternative to Mercer Mettl for small business?
Yes. Assessing AI Starter is $49 a month, $288 a year, with up to 500 responses a month, 3 seats and recorded answers. It lacks live proctoring, code execution and ID verification, so choose it for ordinary roles.
Can I use my own questions instead of a test library?
Yes. Paste the job post and edit the draft on Plus, or write questions yourself on Starter. Choice questions are scored on submit, and written or recorded answers are scored by your team.
Check the skill before the demo call, from $49 a month
Describe the role, review the draft, send one link. Published prices, monthly billing, cancel anytime.