Criteria Corp Alternative for Small Business Hiring
The best Criteria Corp alternative for a small US employer is a tool with a published monthly price that tests the job itself, not only aptitude. Criteria sells Assess, Interview and Hire by quote, built around headcount; contract data from Vendr puts small teams at roughly $5,000 to $15,000 a year. Assessing.ai starts at $49 a month with no contract.
Type the role into the generator and see the questions it drafts. If you need the CCAT or another normed cognitive test with validation evidence, Criteria is the stronger choice, and this page says so plainly below.
Draft a screening test for the role you are hiring now
No account needed to build your first test. Results appear instantly in your dashboard.
Why employers look for a Criteria Corp alternative
Criteria is a well-run, science-heavy vendor, and the CCAT is one of the most used cognitive tests in US hiring. People who shop for an alternative usually have a budget or fit problem, not a quality complaint.
A five-figure number for a four-figure need
Vendr's contract data shows a median Criteria deal of $13,225 a year and $5,000 to $15,000 for teams testing 100 to 500 candidates. A company hiring eight people a year has a hard time justifying that line item.
Priced on headcount, not on hiring
Criteria says its plans are built around your headcount. If you have 120 employees but hire six of them a year, you pay for the size of the company rather than the size of the hiring plan.
Aptitude does not test the job
The CCAT tells you how fast someone learns. It does not tell you whether a bookkeeper can reconcile a bank account or a dispatcher knows how to route a same-day call. Most small employers need that second answer first.
AI features are add-ons
AI proctoring, AI scoring and summaries, and the AI Interview Agent sit on top of the core packages. Each one raises the quote, so the version you demoed is often not the version you can afford.
Recorded answers for people-facing roles
Front desk, sales and support roles are about how someone explains things. Assessing.ai includes recorded audio and video answer questions on every plan, so you hear a candidate before you book a call.
Stop paying between hiring waves
Seasonal hiring and annual contracts do not mix. On a monthly plan you pay for March and April, cancel, and come back in October when the next role opens.
How to replace a Criteria screen in one afternoon
List what a new hire must already know
Write down the two or three skills the person needs on day one. That list becomes the core of the test. A reasoning section is optional for most small-business roles.
Generate the draft test
Paste the job description or type the role. On Plus, the AI drafts multiple choice, written and recorded answer questions for that job in under a minute.
Edit and set the rules
Delete what does not fit, add a question about your own software or process, set a time limit and mark which answers are required.
Send one link and sort by score
Paste the link into the job post or the auto-reply. Multiple choice is scored the moment a candidate submits; you score written and recorded answers in the results view, then sort everyone by total.
Criteria Corp alternatives compared on price and fit
Criteria does not publish prices, so its row uses Vendr's contract data, labeled as such. Other figures come from each vendor's own pricing page or, where the vendor publishes nothing, the listing named in the cell. Prices change, so confirm before you sign.
| Tool | Price | What it tests | Contract | Where it wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria Assess | Quote only; Vendr median $13,225 a year, small teams about $5,000 to $15,000 | CCAT, Cognify and GAME ability tests, personality, emotional intelligence, skills tests, TestMaker for your own questions | Annual, built around headcount | Deep validated library, US compliance story, optional AI proctoring and video interviews |
| Assessing.ai Starter | $49 a month, or $288 a year | Your own job-specific questions, including recorded answers | Monthly, no contract | Lowest flat price, 500 responses a month, 3 team members, custom branding |
| Assessing.ai Plus | $149 a month, or $888 a year | Same, with AI question generation | Monthly, no contract | AI drafts the test from a job description, 2,000 responses a month, score distribution |
| TestGorilla Core | $142 a month, billed $1,704 a year | Library of skills, cognitive and personality tests | Annual | Big library with a published price and a free plan |
| Testlify Standard | $1,668 a year, $21 per extra credit | Library tests, 1 credit per started assessment | Annual | Large library, 30-day money-back guarantee |
| Wonderlic Select | Quote only; listings show $1,000 or more a year (SelectHub) and $6,000 per user per year (Capterra) | Cognitive ability, motivation and personality against job profiles | Annual, by package and employee count | Long track record, Spanish and French, ATS integrations |
Who should switch, and who should stay on Criteria
Switch for owners hiring under 20 people a year
If every role is different and hiring comes in bursts, you need a new job-specific test each time and a bill that stops when hiring stops. That is what a monthly plan is for.
Switch for office, finance and trades roles
For an office manager, an AP clerk or a service coordinator, fifteen questions about the actual work screen better than a general reasoning score, and candidates see why you are asking.
Switch if you already interview everyone anyway
If a person reads every application and calls the top ten, you do not need a normed percentile. You need a quick way to find the ten, and a job test does that.
Stay for high-volume, repeatable roles
Hiring 150 call center or retail staff a year into the same few jobs is where a normed cognitive test pays for itself. Criteria's CCAT and job benchmarks are built for that.
Stay if legal wants validation evidence
If counsel has asked for validation studies and adverse impact data behind every selection tool, buy a validated vendor. Assessing.ai does not publish normative data or validation studies.
Or mix both, Criteria for aptitude and us for the job test
Some employers keep a cognitive screen and add a short role-specific knowledge check after it. The two tools do not overlap, and the second one costs $49 a month.
What a Criteria contract costs a small employer
Criteria does not publish a price list. Its plans page offers three packages, Criteria Assess (assessments), Criteria Interview (async and live video interviews) and Criteria Hire (both), all on the same core platform, with add-ons such as AI proctoring, AI scoring and summaries, the AI Interview Agent and Criteria Develop. Every package is quoted and, in Criteria's words, built around your headcount. HireSelect is the older name for the assessment product, so a quote for HireSelect and one for Criteria Assess describe the same thing.
The best public figures come from Vendr, which tracks real contracts: a median of $13,225 a year, most deals between $9,580 and $19,200, and roughly $5,000 to $15,000 for small teams testing 100 to 500 candidates a year. The full breakdown, including overage rules and typical discounts, is in our Criteria Corp pricing guide.
Compare that with a flat plan. Assessing.ai Plus is $149 a month for 2,000 responses and AI question generation. A company that hires in two waves a year can run it for four months, spend $596 and cancel. Even a full year of Plus billed annually is $888.
Criteria Corp vs TestGorilla vs a job-specific test
Buyers usually shortlist Criteria and TestGorilla together because both sell a library of validated tests. The difference is mostly commercial: TestGorilla publishes a price ($142 a month, billed $1,704 a year for Core) and has a free plan, while Criteria quotes every deal. Our TestGorilla alternative page covers why small teams leave that annual contract too.
A job-specific test is a different kind of tool. Instead of picking from a catalog, you describe the role and get questions about the work itself. For small businesses the two approaches often end up side by side, and our pre-employment testing software for small business page covers the legal basics (Title VII, the ADA and the EEOC's Uniform Guidelines) that apply to any test you give applicants.
What you give up by leaving Criteria
Know this before you switch. Assessing.ai has no CCAT or any other normed cognitive test, no personality or emotional intelligence measures, no validation study, no proctoring, no video interview product and no native ATS connector. Written and recorded answers are scored by someone on your team, not automatically; multiple choice is scored the instant a candidate submits.
What you get is a test that matches the job you posted, a price you can see before you talk to anyone, and no annual renewal. For most employers hiring fewer than 50 people a year that trade is worth it. For volume hiring with a legal review attached, it usually is not, and Criteria is the better buy.
Criteria Corp alternative questions buyers ask
What is a good alternative to Criteria Corp?
For a small employer, a good alternative to Criteria Corp is a job-specific testing tool with a published monthly price, such as Assessing.ai from $49 a month. If you need a validated cognitive test like the CCAT, TestGorilla and Wonderlic are the closest like-for-like options, both on annual plans.
How much does Criteria Corp cost?
Criteria Corp does not publish prices. Assess, Interview and Hire are quoted and built around headcount, usually on an annual contract. Vendr's contract data shows a median of $13,225 a year and roughly $5,000 to $15,000 for small teams testing 100 to 500 candidates a year. Employers get a 14-day free trial.
Criteria Corp vs TestGorilla, which is cheaper?
TestGorilla is usually cheaper for small teams because it publishes a price: Core is $142 a month billed $1,704 a year, and there is a free plan. Criteria is quote only, with a median contract of $13,225 a year in Vendr's data. Criteria's cognitive tests and compliance support are deeper.
Is Criteria Corp proctored?
Criteria's ability tests such as the CCAT are timed, which limits outside help. Criteria also sells AI Proctoring as part of an AI upgrade for Criteria Assess; it samples images, screen and audio during the session and flags anomalies. Assessing.ai has no proctoring, so it suits screens where cheating risk is low.
Does Criteria Corp record you?
Only when the employer uses the features that do. Criteria Interview records async video interviews, and the AI Proctoring upgrade captures periodic image, screen and audio samples. A standard CCAT or personality test without those add-ons does not record video. Assessing.ai records only answers you set as recorded questions.
Is there a Criteria alternative with monthly billing?
Yes. Assessing.ai bills monthly at $49 (Starter), $149 (Plus) or $499 (Pro) with no contract and a 14-day money-back guarantee, so you pay only in the months you hire. Criteria, TestGorilla, Testlify and Wonderlic all sell paid plans on annual terms.
Does Assessing.ai have a test like the CCAT?
No. Assessing.ai has no normed cognitive ability test and no national benchmark behind scores. You can write reasoning questions yourself, but for a validated aptitude score keep Criteria or use a similar vendor, and use Assessing.ai for the job-specific knowledge test.
Test the job, not just the aptitude, from $49 a month
Describe the role, review the draft, send one link. Published prices, monthly billing and a 14-day money-back guarantee.